The ability to stop an already initiated action is paramount to adaptive behavior. Much scientific debate in the field of human action-stopping currently focuses on two interrelated questions. First: Which cognitive and neural processes uniquely underpin the implementation of inhibitory control when actions are stopped after explicit stop-signals, and which processes are instead commonly evoked by all salient signals, even those that do not require stopping? Second: Why do purported (neuro)physiological signatures of inhibition occur at two different latencies after stop-signals? Here, we address both questions via two pre-registered experiments that combined measurements of cortico-spinal excitability (CSE), electromyography (EMG), and whole-scalp electroencephalography (EEG). Adult human subjects performed a stop-signal task that also contained ‘ignore’ signals – equally salient signals that did not require stopping but rather completion of the Go response. We found that both stop- and ignore-signals pro...