Measuring animal welfare and applying scientific advances - Why is it still so difficult? UFAW International Symposium
June 27 , 9:00 AM | June 29, 2017, 3:30 PM
Royal Holloway, University of London
The Old School
Egham, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
Dr Stephen Wickens
P: +44 (0)1582 831818
Animal welfare science is a relatively young field but it is developing rapidly. A recent review noted that over the last two decades the number of scientific publications in this area has increased by 10-15% annually. This research has been used to make many real improvements to the welfare of animals throughout the world.
There seems to be a growing consensus that what matters to those animals that are presumed to experience feelings, and therefore what should matter most to those concerned about animal welfare, is how those animals feel. However, this raises difficult questions, some of which are fundamental to the development of animal welfare science as a rigorous scientific discipline and the assessment of animal welfare. For example:
• Will we ever be able to demonstrate sentience? Knowing where to draw the line about which animals to care for is important to, avoid wasting scarce resources on animals that are not sentient, and to ensure that animals that are sentient are protected. Are there new techniques that could help or is the problem insoluble? Where should the line be drawn?
• Are the techniques that we have to study emotional state (affect) adequate or are there new and better ways of assessing how animals feel about themselves and their environment? How should we best choose and interpret measures? Do technological advances offer us alternative approaches? Is it worth trying to put a numerical value on animal welfare or are qualitative measures more appropriate?
• How does time fit into the equation? Over what period of time should welfare be considered – what is meaningful and relevant to the animal? Do animals experience time as we do? How should we weigh up the challenges and good experiences to come so as to arrive at a view about the animals lifetime experience, and is this worth doing?
• How important is positive welfare? Should preventing suffering be our first priority or should we now be looking to maximise enjoyable experiences for animals in our care too? Is a permanent state of positive welfare possible, or do animals reset their emotional state so that attempts to achieve positive welfare are doomed to failure as the animal habituates to a better than adequate environment? What happens when those experiences preferred by an animal have a long-term negative impact on health?
• How robust is the data collected on animal welfare? Are there lessons to be learnt from other areas of research with respect to e.g. blinding, randomization, pre-registration of hypotheses, null results, meta-analysis, clinical trials?
With the aim of developing new ideas and of promoting higher quality and better-focused animal welfare science, this symposium will consider whether and how animal welfare scientists can make progress in these and other areas.
Speakers will include:
• Professor Georgia Mason (University of Guelph, Canada), ‘Using welfare indicators to make valid inference about animals' subjective states, with a focus on HPA responses and stereotypic behaviour’
• Professor Mike Mendl (University of Bristol, UK) ‘Animal affect: What is it, what do we know, and what can we know?’ and
• Professor Jaak Panksepp (Washington State University, USA) ‘The emotional feelings of other minds: From neuroaffective foundations to novel therapeutics (especially depressions)’
Call for papers
We would like to hear from anyone interested in making a contribution to the symposium on the subjects and themes detailed above or others relating to measuring animal welfare and to animal welfare and the sciences and other disciplines associated with it – eg applied ethology, veterinary, physiological and neuroscience.
The deadline for submission of abstracts is 30th November 2016.